| Author |
 Topic  |
|
demonic 
"Cinemaniac"
|
 Posted - 05/13/2009 : 01:01:29
|
quote:
Originally posted by [matt]
VV to here
Koli, hilarious Anita review!! 
Larry, nice one for Dog Gone South.
And demonic, your "Panties lost, Muff shown." one made me laugh out loud.
Well, there really is nothing like a bit of Muff to brighten the proceedings.  |
 |
|
|
Sean 
"Necrosphenisciform anthropophagist."
|
Posted - 05/13/2009 : 05:13:10
|
quote:
Originally posted by Koli
Four Your Consideration - Treasure Hunt
I'm not in this round, but just pointing out that it's been written EXACTLY this way (minus my highlighting) for at least four years. It wasn't an issue then, and it isn't an issue now. And it never will be an issue.
http://www.fwfr.com/fourum/topic.asp?ARCHIVE=true&TOPIC_ID=1832
|
Edited by - Sean on 05/13/2009 05:14:39 |
|
|
|
[matt]
"Cinemattic."
|
Posted - 05/13/2009 : 14:24:57
|
quote:
Originally posted by demonic
Well, there really is nothing like a bit of Muff to brighten the proceedings.
Haha, ok calm down now demonic, emuff's emuff.
|
|
|
|
Beanmimo 
"August review site"
|
Posted - 05/13/2009 : 14:44:50
|
quote:
Originally posted by [matt]
quote:
Originally posted by demonic
Well, there really is nothing like a bit of Muff to brighten the proceedings.
Haha, ok calm down now demonic, emuff's emuff.
You may be interested in a holiday here to enjoy the local activities!! |
|
|
|
Salopian
"Four ever European"
|
Posted - 05/13/2009 : 15:27:21
|
quote:
Originally posted by [matt]
Macheads is a documentary about the fanaticism surrounding Apple Macs.
I like Macs myself but I have to admit that it's mainly hype. The 'Mapple' episode of The Simpsons is spot on. |
|
|
|
Salopian
"Four ever European"
|
Posted - 05/13/2009 : 15:34:40
|
quote:
Originally posted by Koli
Should I be offended by this comment? I'm not sure what Salopian's driving at.
I don't think you should really be offended by my saying that you are high calibre!
I'm driving at the fact that people like thefoxboy, Josh and Sean have mistitled these threads so often that they have managed to sweep along others like you. While I find the new rule extraordinarily silly and pointless (and bullying), I am the first to admit that that is just subjective preferences on each side (not that it's an equal situation, as I have never said that people should not use the new title). However, this naff Four spelling is neither specified by the new rule nor any of the old ones and it directly contradicts twenty or so subsequent links that display the spelling chosen by Benj. So although its naffness is again subjective, the fact that it is simply wrong is totally objective. |
|
|
|
Salopian
"Four ever European"
|
Posted - 05/13/2009 : 15:39:10
|
quote:
Originally posted by Josh the cat
Although I am waiting for evidence that one FWFR'er said he would send me.
The 'evidence' (not that I called it that) that I mentioned in response to your harassment by private message? As you did not respond, I did not realise that you were in such a hurry to read it. As I reminded you then, I do not have a computer and thus it had to wait till I was on one. |
|
|
|
Salopian
"Four ever European"
|
Posted - 05/13/2009 : 15:41:20
|
quote:
Originally posted by Josh the cat
I actually wanted to note my appreciation that the FWFR time had been reset to normal...whatever that is
It happened about ten days ago so it is rather strange to mention it now/here. |
|
|
|
Salopian
"Four ever European"
|
Posted - 05/13/2009 : 15:45:45
|
quote:
Originally posted by Se�n
I'm not in this round, but just pointing out that it's been written EXACTLY this way (minus my highlighting) for at least four years. It wasn't an issue then, and it isn't an issue now. And it never will be an issue.
http://www.fwfr.com/fourum/topic.asp?ARCHIVE=true&TOPIC_ID=1832
Yes, it's been written that way by you and people like you, some of the time. The fact that you've tried to rename Benj's page lots of times doesn't make it any more correct than if you had only tried once.
You obviously do think it's an issue, or you wouldn't keep trying to defend it, especially by coming into rounds especially for that purpose. As I've said before, if you are so keen to change it (for some reason), you should persuade Benj to change it rather than just using propaganda and attrition. |
Edited by - Salopian on 05/13/2009 15:56:57 |
|
|
|
Beanmimo
"August review site"
|
Posted - 05/13/2009 : 15:55:39
|
quote:
Originally posted by Salopian
quote:
Originally posted by Se�n
I'm not in this round, but just pointing out that it's been written EXACTLY this way (minus my highlighting) for at least four years. It wasn't an issue then, and it isn't an issue now. And it never will be an issue.
http://www.fwfr.com/fourum/topic.asp?ARCHIVE=true&TOPIC_ID=1832
Yes, it's been written that way by you and people like you, some of the time. The fact that you've tried to rename Benj's page lots of times doesn't make it any more correct than if you had only tried once.
You obviously do think it's an issue, or you wouldn't keep trying to defend it, especially by coming into rounds especially for that purpose.
Excuse me but what's the difference?
Does it make a difference to the content of the entered reviews by how it is introduced? |
|
|
|
Salopian
"Four ever European"
|
Posted - 05/13/2009 : 15:59:39
|
quote:
Originally posted by Beanmimo
Does it make a difference to the content of the entered reviews by how it is introduced?
I've never said it does. My objecting to it doesn't affect the reviews either so by that argument no one can mind that.
The problem with it is that it is (i) patently not the actual spelling and (ii) so very, very lame.
Perhaps W. should start a special thread to create another silly rule, seeing as it was not at all absurd or disingenous to do so last time. |
Edited by - Salopian on 05/13/2009 16:02:52 |
|
|
|
randall 
"I like to watch."
|
Posted - 05/13/2009 : 16:00:26
|
| V&V |
Edited by - randall on 05/13/2009 16:11:32 |
|
|
|
Beanmimo
"August review site"
|
Posted - 05/13/2009 : 16:17:25
|
quote:
Originally posted by Salopian
quote:
Originally posted by Beanmimo
Does it make a difference to the content of the entered reviews by how it is introduced?
I've never said it does.
Thanks that's all i needed to know. |
|
|
|
lemmycaution
"Long mired in film"
|
Posted - 05/13/2009 : 16:37:14
|
| Shot votes everywhere with my high-calibre voting pistol. |
|
|
|
silly 
"That rabbit's DYNAMITE."
|
Posted - 05/13/2009 : 17:25:41
|
| After kolibrating my mouse, I voted for reviews I liked. |
|
|
|
Topic |
|
Sean's FYCTH - #504
