| Author |
 Topic  |
|
ChocolateLady 
"500 Chocolate Delights"
Israel
|
 Posted - 08/17/2007 : 07:57:14
|
Got everyone so far.
(Still no one likes my Roddy claymation/ruddy complexion FLUSHED Away review?)
|
 |
|
|
Salopian
"Four ever European"
The European Union
|
|
|
Montgomery
"F**k!"
USA
|
Posted - 08/17/2007 : 15:19:06
|
Voted to here now. EM :)
|
|
|
|
ChocolateLady
"500 Chocolate Delights"
Israel
|
Posted - 08/18/2007 : 10:38:35
|
quote:
Originally posted by ChocolateLady
Got everyone so far.
(Still no one likes my Roddy claymation/ruddy complexion FLUSHED Away review?)
Hurrah! Someone liked it. Thanks to whomever and I've hit everyone so far. |
|
|
|
Salopian
"Four ever European"
The European Union
|
Posted - 08/18/2007 : 16:25:40
|
quote:
Originally posted by ChocolateLady
Someone liked it. Thanks to whomever and I've hit everyone so far.
It was me.  I needed the explanation, though: I think something like "Flushed? Roddy complexion!" would be better (assuming that complexion can pass for complexity or something). |
|
|
|
ChocolateLady
"500 Chocolate Delights"
Israel
|
Posted - 08/19/2007 : 06:59:53
|
quote:
Originally posted by Salopian
quote:
Originally posted by ChocolateLady
Someone liked it. Thanks to whomever and I've hit everyone so far.
It was me. I needed the explanation, though: I think something like "Flushed? Roddy complexion!" would be better (assuming that complexion can pass for complexity or something).
Good point. Or perhaps something like "Roddy's complication: Flushed" would be even better, since his problems start when he gets flushed down the toilet, which is embarrasing.
(I'll think this one over a bit and maybe submit another review tomorrow - since I've already submitted 20 this week.)
|
|
|
|
ChocolateLady
"500 Chocolate Delights"
Israel
|
Posted - 08/19/2007 : 08:41:38
|
quote:
Originally posted by ChocolateLady
quote:
Originally posted by Salopian
quote:
Originally posted by ChocolateLady
Someone liked it. Thanks to whomever and I've hit everyone so far.
It was me. I needed the explanation, though: I think something like "Flushed? Roddy complexion!" would be better (assuming that complexion can pass for complexity or something).
Good point. Or perhaps something like "Roddy's complication: Flushed" would be even better, since his problems start when he gets flushed down the toilet, which is embarrasing.
(I'll think this one over a bit and maybe submit another review tomorrow - since I've already submitted 20 this week.)
Wait... what about:
"Roddy's claymation: Flushed Hugh!"
or
"Roddy's complication: Flushed Hugh!"
(Hugh sounds like hue, a ruddy complexion gives you a flushed hue... well? What do you think?)
|
|
|
|
Salopian
"Four ever European"
The European Union
|
Posted - 08/19/2007 : 16:48:18
|
quote:
Originally posted by ChocolateLady
"Roddy's complication: Flushed"
I'd go with "Roddy complication: flushed". Even without the "'s", it still means a complication relating to Roddy, and is closer to "ruddy complexion". I wouldn't add in "Hugh" - I'd say that was trying to get too many puns into the same review, and hue isn't really used with skin tones. You could always submit a "... Roddy Hugh..." review as well. |
|
|
|
ChocolateLady
"500 Chocolate Delights"
Israel
|
Posted - 08/20/2007 : 06:52:59
|
| Well, I decided to go with "Roddy complication: flushed Hugh" since otherwise it sounds a bit generic. |
|
|
|
Topic |
|
MIHAI round 20
