The Four Word Film Review Fourum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
Return to my fwfr
Frequently Asked Questions Click for advanced search
 All Forums
 FWFR Related
 Reviews
 Sean's FYCTH - #470

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize:
UserName:
Password:
Format Mode:
Format: BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkInsert Email Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List
   
Message:

Smilies
Angry [:(!] Approve [^] Big Smile [:D] Black Eye [B)]
Blush [:I] Clown [:o)] Cool [8D] Dead [xx(]
Disapprove [V] Duh [7] Eight Ball [8] Evil [}:)]
Gulp [12] Hog [13] Kisses [:X] LOL [15]
Moon [1] Nerd [18] Question [?] Sad [:(]
Shock [:O] Shy [8)] Skull [20] Sleepy [|)]
Smile [:)] Tongue [:P] Wink [;)] Yawn [29]

   -  HTML is OFF | Forum Code is ON
 
   

T O P I C    R E V I E W
BaftaBaby Posted - 01/01/2009 : 08:39:50
Four Your Consideration - Treasure Hunt

Sean Says:
Penguins!

Put any five reviews you like in your F.Y.C. list.
Do not use reviews from the previous round - you must change them every round.
Post here to declare that you've done it. Sooner is better than later.
Provide a spoiler warning in your post when appropriate.
You must read the F.Y.C.s of all participants.
The next round starts on Monday or Thursday at 6:00 a.m. FWFR time, whichever comes next.




15   L A T E S T    R E P L I E S    (Newest First)
Salopian Posted - 01/06/2009 : 03:53:21
quote:
Originally posted by Whippersnapper

Nope, can't offer any defence whatsoever, apart from the fact that it is filmed entirely at the Taj Mahal, Agra, India, and is narrated by a very famous Indian actor. Oh, and its entirely about the most famous Indian landmark.

Yeah, that sure makes it an Indian film. It's not American at all, despite the film-maker and funding.

You'd better get in touch with the Academy. They're sure to appreciate your correction on how to define what country a film is from. They'll need to get lots of Oscars back so that they can redistribute them.

I'm off to submit "Landmark in French cinema" for The Da Vinci Code and "Landmark in British cinema" for National Lampoon's European Vacation.
hustleboy007 Posted - 01/05/2009 : 18:28:54
quote:
Originally posted by Salopian

quote:
Originally posted by hustleboy007

It's Happy!
It's New!
It's a YEAR!
It's the 2,009th in a Row!
Put 'em all together and you got:
...best wishes from me!


Excellent Prince & Me one.



Awww...! Thanks, Salopian!

Wouldya believe that I had to go through posting this about five or six times till it got accepted?
Whippersnapper. Posted - 01/05/2009 : 17:59:05
quote:
Originally posted by Salopian

quote:
Originally posted by Whippersnapper

quote:
Originally posted by Salopian

quote:
Originally posted by Whippersnapper

New Year? No-one told me!

I'm not really clear as to how one of those makes sense, given that it's not an Indian film.

Benj - is there any way, in the "MY DETAILS" page, where there are personal options, there could be a special little opt-out box for those of us not wishing to participate in the Salopian Masterclass which has recently become so prominent a feature of this thread

While you're at it Benj, could there please be a special marker on reviews with lazy wordplay that have been allowed despite being totally inaccurate? It would be convenient to be able to skip past them.

I take it that W.'s choice of comment here means that he is unable to offer any actual defence of his review.



Nope, can't offer any defence whatsoever, apart from the fact that it is filmed entirely at the Taj Mahal, Agra, India, and is narrated by a very famous Indian actor. Oh, and its entirely about the most famous Indian landmark.

Apart from that, my review "Landmark in Indian Cinema" makes absolutely no sense.

Silly old me.









[matt] Posted - 01/05/2009 : 16:00:56
quote:
Originally posted by Salopian

quote:
Originally posted by [matt]

I know one of these is apparently a very overused pun, but it's the first one I've done!

Very good it is too, and the Wheel one.



Cheers

quote:
Originally posted by ChocolateLady

quote:
Originally posted by Salopian

quote:
Originally posted by Sludge

Demonic said it. Great round.

Quite true.



Agreed - I got 11 votes on one of those reviews of mine.



Yeah excellent round. My "Tai chi..." got 16 votes!
ChocolateLady Posted - 01/05/2009 : 14:01:09
quote:
Originally posted by Salopian

quote:
Originally posted by Sludge

Demonic said it. Great round.

Quite true.



Agreed - I got 11 votes on one of those reviews of mine.
Salopian Posted - 01/05/2009 : 13:56:03
quote:
Originally posted by Sludge

Demonic said it. Great round.

Quite true.
Salopian Posted - 01/05/2009 : 13:54:57
quote:
Originally posted by chazbo

quote:
Originally posted by Salopian

quote:
Originally posted by chazbo

And, Salopian, your W. review is great!

Thanks. I think it may come across to others as "Thinking George" (although that is more true of the film than reality anyway), but what I mean is "Bizarre George".

I think the parallel to the children's story character works, too: someone poking his nose into where it shouldn't be and causing all kinds of trouble.

That's through luck rather than judgment, I have to admit.
Salopian Posted - 01/05/2009 : 13:53:12
quote:
Originally posted by Whippersnapper

quote:
Originally posted by Salopian

quote:
Originally posted by Whippersnapper

New Year? No-one told me!

I'm not really clear as to how one of those makes sense, given that it's not an Indian film.

Benj - is there any way, in the "MY DETAILS" page, where there are personal options, there could be a special little opt-out box for those of us not wishing to participate in the Salopian Masterclass which has recently become so prominent a feature of this thread

While you're at it Benj, could there please be a special marker on reviews with lazy wordplay that have been allowed despite being totally inaccurate? It would be convenient to be able to skip past them.

I take it that W.'s choice of comment here means that he is unable to offer any actual defence of his review.
Sludge Posted - 01/05/2009 : 05:09:03
VV. Demonic said it. Great round.

lemmycaution Posted - 01/05/2009 : 04:22:10
VV
chazbo Posted - 01/05/2009 : 03:39:11
quote:
Originally posted by Salopian

quote:
Originally posted by chazbo

And, Salopian, your W. review is great!

Thanks. I think it may come across to others as "Thinking George" (although that is more true of the film than reality anyway), but what I mean is "Bizarre George".



I think the parallel to the children's story character works, too: someone poking his nose into where it shouldn't be and causing all kinds of trouble.

demonic Posted - 01/05/2009 : 03:25:21
Very strong round... some absolute corkers in there. Great start to 09 one and all!
Whippersnapper. Posted - 01/05/2009 : 01:39:39
quote:
Originally posted by Salopian

quote:
Originally posted by Whippersnapper

New Year? No-one told me!

I'm not really clear as to how one of those makes sense, given that it's not an Indian film.




Benj - is there any way, in the "MY DETAILS" page, where there are personal options, there could be a special little opt-out box for those of us not wishing to participate in the Salopian Masterclass which has recently become so prominent a feature of this thread?

Thanks!


()




Salopian Posted - 01/05/2009 : 01:20:34
quote:
Originally posted by chazbo

And, Salopian, your W. review is great!

Thanks. I think it may come across to others as "Thinking George" (although that is more true of the film than reality anyway), but what I mean is "Bizarre George".
Salopian Posted - 01/05/2009 : 01:16:27
quote:
Originally posted by Yukon

Time to stop horsing around and post my FYC reviews.

Even though the holy word/Hollywood pun has been done before here, that's such a perfect film that it's still a very nice review.

The Four Word Film Review Fourum © 1999-2024 benj clews Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000